Assessment, Individual Education Plans

Home | Autism History And Statistics | Advocacy | Assessment, Individual Education Plans (IEP), Rights and more....... | Assessment, Individual Education Plans | Brain and Autism | Chelating | Chiropractic Medicine and Autism | Depression | Depression (continued) | Developmental Checklist, Milestones | Environmental Issues | Epilepsy, Puberty and Seizures | Explaining Autism | GFCF Diet, Food Issues, Etc. | Information (Autism and more......) | Mercury and Vaccination Information | Mercury and Vaccination Info (cont'd) | Myths About Autism | Neuropsychological Testing | Obtaining Your Child's School Records | PDD-NOS | Safety | Seizures | Speech, Language, Communication | State by State DOE Links; Support Information | Therapy | Videos, Links and Interesting Stuff | Vision and Autism | Vitamin Therapy | Articles, Information..... | Articles, Information...... (cont'd) | Websites Of Interest - Disorder Info | Links to Support, Info, Advocacy | Letter Writing | Autism and More Into Adulthood | Autism and More Into Adulthood (continued) | Promoting Autism Awareness | Poems, Stories ........ | Poems, Stories (cont'd) | Books, Games, Movies ..... | Books for the child/adult with ADD | Home Schooling | Home Schooling Links | Guest Book

The Autistic Spectrum

Information on how the IEP process works, how to write IEP's, advocacy, etc. I will be adding to this regularly. I have many sources for this info, some info is old and I don't know who to give credit to, so if you know the source, please click here: christinag@mchsi.com and let me know. :)



A COMPLETE IEP CONTAINS:

 

1. A statement of the student's current services and present placement.

 

2. A statement of the student's abilities and present levels of performance.

a. Academic strengths

b. Academic needs

c. Physical/Motor development

d. Self-help/Personal care skills

e. Learning style

f. Social skills

g. Vocational/Pre-vocational skills

  

3. A statement of annual goals that describe what the student can be expected to accomplish within the next twelve (12) month period.

a. Academic goals (i.e., math, reading, other subject areas)

b. Social/Behavior goals

c. Self-help/Personal care goals

d. Physical/Motor development goals

e. Vocational/Pre-vocational goals 

 

4. A statement of short-term instructional objectives.

a. Objectives that will help the student reach the stated goals.

b. Objectives written so they can be measured.

 

5. A statement of the specific special education services/placement and the goals to be worked on in that setting. 

 

6. A statement of related services which will help the student benefit from special education.

a. Date services will begin

b. How often services will be provided

c. How long services will last per session

d. When services will end

e. Location of services

f. Who will provide each service

 

7. A statement of how much the student will participate in general education classes/activities.

a. All modifications that will be made in the general education program

b. The name of the "teacher of record" who monitors how the IEP is put into effect in general education and to whom progress/needs will be reported by general education teachers

c. Who will report/communicate with parents and how often those reports will be provided. 

 

8. A statement of specifically designed materials and/or assistive equipment needed by the student and who will provide it.

  

9. A statement of the projected year and month in which the student will be re-evaluated.

 

10. A provision for attaching written opinions.

 

11. A statement of necessary transition services, if applicable.

 

12. For students in early childhood special education programs, objectives for parents to implement at home may be included. 

 

13. A statement of extended school year services, if applicable.

 

Individualized Education Program (IEP) Checklist

 

I. IEP Content

 

A. In General

 

The IEP for each child includes:

 

1.__a statement of the child's present levels of performance including how the disability affects the child's involvement and progress in the general curriculum. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(I) IDEA 1997]

2.__for preschool children, how the disability affects the child's participation in appropriate activities. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(II) IDEA 1997]

3.__measurable annual goals and benchmarks (short term objectives) related to the child's needs resulting from the child's disability that will enable the child to be involved in and progress in the general curriculum. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I) IDEA 1997]

4.__a direct relationship between the present levels of performance, any assessments and the educational services to be provided and the student's goals and benchmarks. [5 CCR 3040(c)]

5.__a statement of the special education, related services and supplementary aids and services to be provided to or on behalf of the child. [Section 414(d)(1)(A)(iii) IDEA 1997]

6.__descriptions of program modifications and supports for school personnel that will be provided to enable the child to

__advance toward attaining annual goals

__be involved and progress in the general education curriculum and participate in extracurricular activities and

__be educated and participate with other children with disabilities and with nondisabled children. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(iii)(I), (II) and (III) IDEA 1997]

7.__an explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in the regular class and activities in #6. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(iv) IDEA 1997]

8.__a statement of how the child's parents will be regularly informed (perhaps through periodic report cards) at least as often as are parents of nondisabled children regarding their child's progress toward annual goals, and the extent to which that progress will enable the child to achieve the annual goals by year's end. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(viii) IDEA 1997]

9.__a statement of whether the child will

__take district, state-wide achievement tests

__without accommodations or modifications

__with such accommodations. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(v)(I) IDEA 1997]

10.__an explanation of why the child will not participate in such assessment of the IEP team makes that decision. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(v)(II) IDEA 1997]

11.__a statement of how that student will be tested in state-wide or district tests are not used. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vi) IDEA 1997]

12.__the projected date for initiating services and modifications. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vi) IDEA 1997]

13.__the anticipated frequency, duration and location of the recommended services and modifications. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vi) IDEA 1997]

14.__the need for extended school year services. [EC 56345(b)(5)]

15.__whether differential graduation standards for the student will be developed. (If so, they

16.__for newly referred pupils, documentation of the consideration of and prior use of regular education resources and that parents are aware of the full continuum of program options. [EC 56303]

17.__documentation that the IEP team considered

__the strengths of the child and parent concerns

__the results of the initial or most recent evaluation of the child. [Section 1414(d)(3)(A) IDEA 1997]

18.__for students determined to have a specific learning disability, the IEP team certifies that

__the disability is not the result of visual, hearing, motor impairment, mental retardation or emotional disturbance

__observations of relevant behavior of the student

__the relationship of that behavior to the student's academic functioning

__the existence of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and academic achievement in oral and written language, reading, or mathematics which cannot be corrected through regular or categorical services

__the existence of a psychological processing disorder. [34 CFR 300.541; EC 56337]

 

I. IEP Content

 

B. Transition Requirements

19.__for students beginning at age 14 and on an annual basis thereafter, IEP goals, benchmarks (objectives) that focus on the transition needs of the student in his/her courses of study. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vii)(I) IDEA 1997]

20.__for students at age 16 or younger if appropriate, a description of a coordinated set of activities designed within an outcome oriented process and reviewed annually which promotes movement of the student from school to post-school activities [34 CFR 300.27(a)] and

__takes into account the student's interests, preferences, and needs [34 CFR 300.27(b)] and

__states the interagency responsibilities or any needed linkages to implement the transition activities. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vii)(II) IDEA 1997]

21.__for students not requiring transition services in one or more of the four required areas (instruction, community experiences, development of employment, and post school adult and living objectives - and if appropriate, daily living skills and functional vocational evaluation, an explanation of the basis on which that determination was made for each area in which service was not recommended on the IEP. [34 CFR 300.347]

22.__related services continue to be considered and recommended, if needed, for students in every program and age group, by the IEP team. [California Federal Corrective Action Plan 1998]

23.__for students for whom an agency fails to provide transition services, an IEP meeting is called to develop alternative strategies to meet transition objectives set out in the IEP. [Section 1414(d)(5) IDEA 1997]

24.__if an invited agency representative cannot attend the IEP meeting, steps are taken to obtain agency participation in planning transition services. [34 CFR 300.344(b)(3)]

25.__beginning at least one year before the student reaches the age of 18, a statement that the student has been informed of the IDEA rights that will transfer to the student upon turning 18. [Section 1414(d)(1)(A)(vii)(III) IDEA 1997]

26.__for an eligible child moving from an infant program who turns three, the PEA conducts, attends the IEP to establish a transition plan. [EC 56426.9 and Section 1427(a)(8)(ii)(III) IDEA 1997]

27.__transition language in the IEP supports the movement of students from special to general education classrooms, from middle to high school, and from infant to preschool to kindergarten to first grade programs. [EC 56345(6)(B); EC 56326.9; EC 56445(a)]

 

I. IEP Content

C. Consideration of Special Factors

28. The IEP team considers the following:

__for a student with a low incidence disability, considers specialized services, equipment and materials consistent with state guidelines [EC 56345(b)(7)]

__for a student whose behavior impedes her or his learning or that of others, provide for positive behavioral interventions, strategies and supports to address the behavior

__for a student with limited English proficiency, consider the language needs of the child

__for a student who is visually impaired, determine the appropriate medium/media for the child in accordance with state guidelines (EC 56352(d) and 56136]

__provide for instruction in Braille and the use of Braille unless the IEP team determines, after evaluation, that Braille instruction or use is not appropriate for the child [Section 1414(d)(3)(B) IDEA 1997]

__for a child who is deaf or hard of hearing, consider the child's communication needs, opportunities for direct communication with peers and professional personnel in the child's language/communication mode that meets all the child's needs, is at his or her academic level, and meets the child's needs for direct instruction [EC 56345(e); [Section 1414(d)(3)(B)(iv) IDEA 1997]

__for any child, consider whether the child requires assistive technology and services. [Section 1414(d)(3)(B)(v) IDEA 1997]

I. IEP Content

D. IEP Meeting Notice Requirements

29.__The public education agency (PEA)* makes every effort to ensure that one or both parents of the child with a disability can attend the IEP meeting.

30.__The meeting notice indicates the meeting's purpose (transition, pre-expulsion, change of placement, three year review, etc.), the location, the time of the meeting and lists who will attend. [34 CFR 300.345(b)]

31.__If the team considers transition services for students of any age, the IEP notice must note that this is the purpose of the meeting and

__indicate that the student is invited to the meeting

__identify and invite any other agency involved to send a representative. [34 CFR 300.2345(b)(2) and 300.344(c); Section 1414(d)(vii) IDEA 1997]

32.__A copy of the Parent Rights Notice is provided to parents along with the meeting notice. [Section 1415(d)(1)(B) IDEA 1997]

33.__The meeting notice, Parent Rights and IEP are in the primary language of the parent unless clearly not feasible to do so. [5 CCR 3040(b); Section 1415(b)(4) and (d)(2) IDEA 1997]

*The term PEA includes not only public schools, but also the California Youth Authority, state hospitals, developmental centers and mental health, among others.

 

II. IEP Process

A. In General

34.__By the third birthday of a child eligible for services, the IEP is implemented. [Section 1412(a)(9) IDEA 1997]

35.__An IEP has been developed and implemented for each child served by the agency, including any child in private school eligible for special education and related services from the agency. [Section 1412(a)(3)(A), see also Section 1412(a)(10)(A) IDEA 1997]

36.__The IEP is in effect before special education and related services are provided to a child [34 CFR 300.342] and at the beginning of each school year. [Section 1414(d)(2)(A) IDEA 1997]

37.__The IEP meeting is nonadversarial and is held solely to make educational decisions for the good of the child with the disability. [EC 56341(h)]

38.__The IEP is implemented as soon as possible after the IEP meeting. [5 CCR 3040(a)]

39.__The general education teacher participates as appropriate in the IEP, including the determination of

-positive behavior interventions and strategies

-supplementary aids and services

-program modifications

-supports for school personnel. [Section 1414(d)(3)(C) IDEA 1997]

40.__The IEP is reviewed at least annually to consider whether annual goals are being achieved and

__to address any lack of progress toward annual goals and in the general curriculum

__to consider the results of any reevaluation

__to consider information provided by the parents

__to consider the child's anticipated needs

__to consider other matters as appropriate [EC 56343; [Section 1414(d)(4) IDEA 1997]

41.__The IEP team includes:

__the parents of the child

__at least one general education teacher if the child is in or may be participating in general education (the student's teacher)

__a special education teacher/specialist

__a representative of the PEA who is qualified to provide or supervise specially designed instruction for children with disabilities is knowledgeable about the general curriculum and the resources of the PEA

__an individual who can interpret the instructional implications of the evaluations

__other individuals with knowledge or expertise regarding the child

__other individuals as the parent or PEA wishes

__the child, when appropriate - must be invited to all IEP meetings that consider post secondary transition. [Section 1414(d)(1)(B) IDEA 1997; EC 56341]

42.__Interpreters for the IEP meeting are obtained for parents who are deaf or whose primary language is other than English. [34 CFR 300.345(e) proposed]

43.__The PEA gives the parent a copy of the IEP at no cost, and when requested and if feasible, in the primary language of the parent. [5 CCR 3040(b)]

44.__The parent is provided with a copy of the evaluation report and the documentation that formed the basis for the determination of eligibility. [Section 1414(a)(4)(B) IDEA 1997]

45.__For students newly referred to special education, an assessment plan is developed and given to the parents along with a copy of the Parent Rights within 15 days from the time the referral was made. [EC 56321(a)]

46.__Assessments are completed and the IEP meeting held within 50 calendar days of obtaining the parent signature agreeing to the student's assessment plan. [EC 56344]

47.__All service providers, the school site and any outside agencies who will provide services are given a copy of the IEP or are knowledgeable of its content. [EC 563471]

48.__The district or PEA appoints a surrogate parent where no parent can be located or if the court has specifically limited the right of a parent or guardian to make educational decisions for the child. [Ca GC Chapter 6.5 Section 7579.5]

49.__The parents are informed in the Parent Rights document of their right to record the IEP meeting. [EC 56341(g)(1) and (1)]

50.__If neither parent can attend the IEP meeting the PEA uses other means to ensure parent participation including individual or conference phone calls. [34 CFR 300.345(c)]

51.__The IEP team reviews the student's progress toward previous annual goals, benchmarks (short term objectives) and in the general curriculum when developing new goals, benchmarks, short term objectives. [Section 1414(d)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) IDEA 1997]

52.__An IEP meeting is held within 30 days of receipt of a written request from a parent. [EC 56343.5]

 

II. IEP Process

B. Interim/Administrative Placements

53.__A student transferring into the district is immediately placed in a district or agency program in conformity with the student's IEP (unless the parent agrees otherwise) for a period not to exceed 30 days. [EC 56325(a)]

54.__Before the expiration of the 30 day placement, the IEP team meets, reviews information, records, reports, any evaluations and makes a final recommendation for placement. All the usual requirements for holding IEP meetings are followed. [EC 56325(b)]

 

II. IEP Process

C. IEP Process to Consider Suspension or Expulsion

55.__When a disciplinary action involving suspension or expulsion of more than 10 days in a school year occurs, the student is provided all IEP services on the 11th day. [Section 1415(k)(3) IDEA 1997]

56.__If disciplinary action is considered to change a student's placement for 10 days or more because the student has violated a rule or code of conduct applying to all children,

__the parents are notified on the same day this decision is made and given a copy of their Parent Rights [Section 1415(k)(4) IDEA 1997]

__the IEP meeting is held on or before the 10th day of suspension to consider if the behavior was a manifestation of the child's disability and if placement was appropriate

__a functional behavioral assessment and a behavioral plan are drawn up to address the behavior that resulted in the suspension if such a plan is not already in place. [Section 1415(k)(1)(B) IDEA 1997]

57.__In making the manifestation determination, the IEP team must also consider whether:

__services including the behavior intervention strategies plan, were provided consistent with the IEP

__the disability impaired the child's ability to understand the impact and consequences of the behavior in question and

__the disability impaired the child's ability to control the behavior that led to the disciplinary action. [Section 1415(k)(4)(C) IDEA 1997]

58.__The IEP team, in making the manifestation determination, considers all evaluations, parent input, health records, observations, discipline records, implementation of the IEP, and the student's placement. Section 1415(k)(4)(C) IDEA 1997]

59.__If a parent is unable to attend the IEP meeting, a telephone conference may be used for the IEP meeting to consider expulsion. [EC 48915.5(d)]

60.__If a parent has received proper notice of the meeting, chooses not to participate in the IEP meeting or to consent to an extension beyond 20 consecutive school days, the meeting may be conducted without the parent. [EC 48915.5(d)]

61.__The education program specified in the IEP must be provided to the pupil during the period of the expulsion. [Section 1415(k)(3)(B) IDEA 1997]

62.__Parents make the student available without delay at a site determined by the district for the pre-expulsion assessment required prior to the IEP meeting held to consider expulsion. [EC 48915.1(e)]

63.__Parents are allowed to request a postponement of the IEP meeting of up to three school days. [EC 48915.5(d)]

64.__Parents are informed at least 48 hours before the IEP meeting of their right to participate in the IEP meeting held to consider initiation of expulsion proceedings. [EC 48915.5(d)]

65.__Parents have the right to pursue a due process hearing if they disagree with the decisions of the IEP team regarding expulsion. [EC 48915.5(3)(g)]

66.__The expulsion hearing is conducted only after the pre-expulsion assessment is completed, the IEP team convenes and finds that the behavior was not a manifestation of the students disability [EC 48915.5(e)], that placement was appropriate, that IEP-driven behavior plan interventions were tried and any due process proceedings were completed. [EC 48915.5(h); Section 1415(k) IDEA 1997]

67.__Relevant disciplinary procedures applicable to all children may be carried out only when all conditions in Item 65 are met. [Section 1415(k)(5)(A) IDEA 1997]

II. IEP Process

D. Behavior Intervention Plans (Hughes Act)

68.__The IEP team specifies the development of a functional analysis assessment if it determines that other behavioral/instructional approaches specified in the student's IEP have been ineffective. [5 CCR 3052(b)]

69.__Parents may request that a functional analysis assessment be performed. [5 CCR 3042(b)]

70.__The case manager for behavior intervention is a member of the IEP team that reviews the functional analysis and develops the behavior intervention plan, which becomes part of the IEP. [5 CCR 3052(b)]

In order to fully implement Hughes Act requirements for Behavior Intervention Plans, refer to the local procedures or guidelines developed for this purpose in accordance with 5 CCR 3052.

* * * * * * * * *

An appropriate IEP is driven by an appropriate Evaluation Report!

Reason for Referral

The purpose of the evaluation is to determine: 1) if the child has a disability and 2) if the child needs specially designed instruction. Information should be provided as to who initiated the referral (e.g., teacher, parent), and for what reasons. The evaluation team must articulate the referral questions that was used to design an
individualized evaluation. The more precisely the questions are posed; the more accurately the body of the Evaluation Report (ER) will address the questions.

The IEP team must consider the following special factors before developing the IEP: visual impairment; hearing impairment; behaviors that impede learning or that of others; limited English proficiency; communication needs; assistive technology devices and/or services; and transition services. The information needed to make the special determinations should be collected during the evaluation, and could be addressed in the Reasons for Referral.

Educational Levels of Performance and Educational Needs of the Child

This section includes the students:

§ current functioning
§ strengths
§ progress in the general curriculum
§ response to the instructional program, and
§ results of the instructional evaluation.

The extent to which the student displays difficulties that cannot be adequately met in a regular education program should also be identified in this section. Areas in which the student performs well in the regular education program should be articulated, as well as the students instructional or functioning level in comparison to the expectations of the regular class program. All assessments conducted should be reported, including the psychological evaluation, instructional or ecological evaluations, vocational evaluations, observations, functional behavioral assessments, teacher

!!! and parent reports, !!!

and the evaluations of other specialists (e.g., speech and language, OT, PT, etc.). The most effective procedure for writing this section is to address thematically the questions posed in the referral. This practice is preferred to a style of reporting results by assessment procedure (i.e., test by test) or even by assessment personnel. Working in this manner, all results should be reported including
academic performance, vocational skills, cognitive abilities, developmental levels, emotional and behavioral status, preferences, interests, special abilities, physical/motor functioning. Organizing the findings into themes will facilitate the evaluation team in addressing final conclusions and recommendations.

The ER should list the student's relative strengths in academic, vocational, and emotional/behavioral areas, when applicable. The student's preferences and interests must be addressed if the student is aged  for transition planning purposes, or if the IEP team determines that transition planning should be done for a student younger.  Addressing the student's strengths is particularly useful in designing effective instructional strategies.

EVALUATION DATA RESULTS OF DIRECT INTERVENTION -The team will include information on the following areas that impact the students ability to access the general curriculum:

Physical, social or cultural background information relevant to the childs disability and need for special education.

Physical, Social or Cultural Background Information
This section should include information about the student's physical, social or cultural background, and other aspects of the student's life that impact on the students current educational status. Historical information that has no relevance to the recommendations regarding eligibility or programming should not be included.

Current Classroom Based Observations
The purpose of the observation is to produce data useful in answering the referral questions. The observations should be planned with this outcome in mind.

This section includes information from observations in instructional settings, in or outside the classroom, which may be related to the student's strengths, needs, and areas for specially designed instruction. Observational information is as important as testing information if the observation documents specific skills that the student is capable of performing, or specific skills that the student needs. Observations need to be structured and occur when the student is engaged. Observations may also include more than one subject or class, and determine task comprehension, task completion, time spent on task, classroom environment and level of peer interaction. In addition, this section includes results of the assessment of the students functioning in the curriculum, including curriculum-based or performance-based assessments. For students with behavioral concerns, this may include a systematic observation of the students behavior in the classroom or area in which the student is displaying difficulty. This information should be databased information related to the childs suspected disability or identified disability. The information should be as comprehensive as possible across varied settings with the identification of as many variables of learning as possible.

For example: Does the student demonstrate inappropriate behaviors only in those instructional areas where there are discrepancies, or are they demonstrated across all areas regardless of level of competency in the area?

Does the student demonstrate partial competency in areas of academic discrepancies resulting from fragmented acquisition of skills (some phonological awareness, but no alphabetic principle)?

This section should report a description of direct interventions that may have been implemented in the regular classroom, as well as the outcomes of the interventions.

For all students, current classroom-based assessments and observations, and observations by teachers and related services providers must be conducted.

For a student who is suspected of having a specific learning disability, regulations also require that at least one team member other than the childs regular teacher observe the childs academic performance in the regular classroom. Any member of the evaluation team may conduct this observation.

Evaluation and Information Provided by the Parents
Input from the parents should relate to, and offer information that would be helpful in answering, the referral questions. !!! An important part of the ER is the input that has been provided by (not about) the parents or persons with whom the student lives, as well as the results of any independent educational evaluations that have been completed. The extent to which observed school performance is or is not demonstrated in the home or community has diagnostic significance. This is especially pertinent to the evaluation of the student's adaptive behavior. !!!  Similarly, the parents' information may lead to improved ideas about effective instructional and behavioral strategies.!!!  Information from the parents should be clearly indicated in the ER, with phrases such as "as reported by the parents... If unable to get input from the parents, describe attempts made to obtain the information.

Assessment Not Conducted Under Standard Conditions
Describe non-standard conditions that existed as part of the assessment. Otherwise, make the statement that the evaluation was conducted under standard conditions.

If an assessment is not conducted under standard conditions, a description of the extent to which it varied from standard conditions must be included. Such deviations might include the qualifications of the person administering the test or the method of test administration. Were tests selected appropriately and properly validated for the student? Were sub-sections of the test given instead of the full assessment? Was the student ill?

Summary of Findings/Interpretation of Assessment Results
This section is an analysis of the data collected, thus far, in the evaluation process for the student. In this section, the rationale for the determination of eligibility is explained. The evaluation team answers the referral questions posed at the beginning of the evaluation process. The summary and interpretations should focus on answering these questions.

For a child suspected of having a specific learning disability, the documentation of the teams determination of eligibility must include a statement of: 1) whether the child has a specific learning disability; 2) the basis for making the determination; 3) the relevant behavior noted during the observation of the child; 4) the relationship of that behavior to the childs academic functioning; 5) the educationally relevant medical findings, if any; 6) whether there is a severe discrepancy between achievement and ability that is not correctable without special education and related services; and 7) the determination of the team concerning the effects of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

For a Child Suspected of Having a Specific Learning Disability
These seven statements must be documented ONLY for students thought to have a specific learning disability.

The evaluation team, in determining that a student has a specific learning disability, must document its determination by including statements that address the issues above. In its documentation, the team may want to identify the specific area in which the disability exists (i.e., oral expression, listening)

Annotated Evaluation Report
comprehension, written expression, basic reading skill, reading comprehension, mathematics calculation, or mathematical reasoning).
A team may determine that a child has a specific learning disability if: 1) The child does not achieve commensurate with his or her age and ability levels in one or more of the areas which follow, if provided with learning experiences appropriate for the childs age and ability levels: oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading skill, reading comprehension, mathematics calculation, and mathematical reasoning; and 2) The child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability in one or more of the areas listed above.

The team may not identify a child as having a specific learning disability if the severe discrepancy between ability and achievement is primarily the result of a visual, hearing, or motor impairment; mental retardation; emotional disturbance; or environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

Conclusion That the Student is a Child With a Disability
If the evaluation team concludes that the student meets the two-pronged criteria as a child with a disability, the disability and, when appropriate, the secondary disability, are noted, as well as the need for specially designed instruction.

A child with a disability (§300.7) is a student with mental retardation, a hearing impairment including deafness, a speech or language impairment, a visual impairment including blindness, emotional disturbance, an orthopedic impairment, autism, traumatic brain injury, and other health impairment, a specific learning disability, deaf-blindness or multiple disability and needs special education and related services. If no secondary disability has been identified, write None in the space.

Recommendations regarding special education and related services needed to enable the child to meet goals and to participate as appropriate in the general curriculum:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Recommendation Regarding Special Education
Special education is recommended when the specialized instruction and related services as available through special education, (e.g. accommodations) are necessary to provide the student with FAPE. In this section, describe the types of special education and related services recommended for the student.
Conclusion That the Student is Not a Child with a Disability
If the evaluation team concludes that the student does not meet the two-pronged criteria as a child with a disability, this conclusion is checked.

REEVALUATIONS

Date IEP Team Reviewed Existing Evaluation Data
The date requested in this section would be either the date on which the IEP team met to review data, or the date on which team members completed their individual reviews of the childs existing evaluation data.

The IEP team, including the school psychologist for certain disabilities, may conduct its review without a meeting. (There is no requirement for a meeting at any point in the evaluation or reevaluation process.)
They may choose to have each team member individually review the childs existing evaluation data, including portfolios, work samples, etc. or they may have met as a team to review the data. Indicate the date the last team member reviewed the evaluation data.

Information Reviewed
Existing evaluation data includes evaluations and information provided by the parents,!!!  Current classroom-based assessments and observations, and observations by teachers and related services providers. On the basis of that review and input from the parents, this team identifies: what additional data, if any are needed to determine whether the child has a particular category of disability or, in the case of a reevaluation, whether the child continues to have such a disability; the present levels of performance and educational needs of the child; whether the child needs special education and related services, or in the case of a reevaluation, whether the child continues to need special education and related services; and whether any additions or modifications to the special education and related services are needed to enable the child to meet the measurable annual goals in the IEP and to participate, as appropriate, in the general curriculum.

For those students determined by the IEP team to be eligible for transition services, the team needs to consider if additional evaluation data are needed to develop course of study, post-school outcomes, needed transition services, etc. Data that might be collected include student interest inventories, career education information, formal and informal prevocational and vocational assessments, and observation of work-based learning. Since some of these surveys/assessments are routinely given to all students, the collection of such data may not require reevaluation. Whether additional data are needed as part of a reevaluation must be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending on the needs of the child and the information available regarding the child.

For a child suspected of having a specific learning disability, the documentation of the teams determination of eligibility must include a statement of: 1) whether the child has a specific learning disability; 2) the basis for making the determination; 3) the relevant behavior noted during the observation of the child; 4) the relationship of that behavior to the childs academic functioning; 5) the educationally relevant medical findings, if any; 6) whether there is a severe discrepancy between achievement and ability that is not correctable without special education and related services; and 7) the determination of the team concerning the effects of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

For a Child Suspected of Having a Specific Learning Disability
The evaluation team, in determining that a student has a specific learning disability, must document its determination by including statements that address the seven issues above. In its documentation, the team may want to identify the specific area in which the disability exists (i.e., oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading skill, reading comprehension, mathematics calculation, or mathematical reasoning). These statements must be documented ONLY for students thought to have a specific learning disability. A team may determine that a child has a specific learning disability if: 1) The child does not achieve commensurate with his or her age and ability levels in one or more of the areas which follow, if provided with learning experiences appropriate for the childs age and ability levels: oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading skill,
reading comprehension, mathematics calculation, and mathematical reasoning; and 2) The child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability in one or more of the areas listed above.

The team may not identify a child as having a specific learning disability if the severe discrepancy between ability and achievement is primarily the result of a visual, hearing, or motor impairment; mental retardation; emotional disturbance; or environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.

Conclusion That No Additional Evaluation Data Are Needed
If the IEP team determines that no additional evaluation data are needed, the LEA must notify the childs parents of that determination and the reason for it, and !!! of the right of the parent to request an assessment !!!  to determine whether their child continues be eligible for special education and related services. The team may have collected sufficient data and, upon review of this data, felt that it has enough information to make a decision about continued eligibility.

Once the IEP team concludes that it does not need additional evaluation data, there are two decisions that the team can make. If the IEP team decides that the student continues to be eligible for and in need of special education, the LEA would issue the Invitation to Participate in the IEP Team Meeting or Other Meeting and begin the IEP development process. If the IEP team decides that the student no longer is eligible for special education, the LEA would issue the Notice noting this decision. Parents may request a copy of the Procedural Safeguards.

Additional Evaluation Data Are Needed
If the IEP team determines that additional data are needed, the LEA must issue a Permission to Reevaluate, conduct a reevaluation to produce the data identified from the list above, complete all the required components of the ER, and forward a copy of the report to the parents within "x" school days of the districts receipt of the Permission to Reevaluate.

The LEA must get informed parental consent to conduct the reevaluation. However, if after reasonable attempts to contact the parents the LEA has not received consent, the LEA is permitted to proceed with the reevaluation.


Evaluation Report - Signatures
Districts must document those individuals who participated in the evaluation process for all students with disabilities. Districts may choose to use this section for this purpose. For students with specific learning disabilities ONLY, the signature section, including the yes and no, are required. Each team member is to indicate if the report reflects his/her conclusion by checking yes or no. If no is checked, the team member must submit a separate statement presenting his or her conclusions.

Copies to:
Parent
Teacher
Building Principal
Others:________________________________________________

* * * * * * * * *

FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT

What a Functional Behavioral assessment is ...

  • an approach used to help a pupil with a chronic behavior problem
  • a problem solving method - one which takes time and creative collabration among professsionals and parents
  • built on the assumption that, if a pupil keeps repeating a problem behavior, that behavior must be serving some purpose for the student - otherwise, he or she would not keep repeating it
  • a process of looking for patterns in what happens around and/or to the student just before and just after the problem behavior
  • examination of these patterns to identify their purpose or their "function;" some possible functions are: avoiding something, getting something, and making something happen
  • creative problem solving to enable the pupil to achieve the same purpose in a more appropriate or more acceptable way

What Functional Behavioral assessment is NOT ...

  1. the first technique a teacher uses when a pupil misbehaves
  2. a quick fix
  3. a choice for teachers of pupils with disabilities - it's required by federal statutes (such as the IDEA and Section 504) and by some states (such as New York)
  4. a do-it-yourself technique - it takes collaboration

**Some Common Functions Served by Misbehaving**

Some common functions served by misbehaving are . . .

getting attention from teachers or peers - for example . . .

  • arriving late -> people look at you
  • talking when you're supposed to be quiet ---> the teacher reprimands you
  • making silly noises or telling dumb jokes ---> peers talk to you ( or about you within your hearing)
  • giving a flip answer to a teacher's question ---> peers laugh at you

escaping work, people, noise, or something else-for example ~  

  • hand-flapping and moaning ---> getting to go sit in the "quiet" room
  • giving a really wrong answer to a vocabulary question --->getting a teacher to "throw up her arms" in exasperation and walk away, never calling you to read aloud
  • cursing at the teacher when she insists you do the assignment ---> getting sent to the vice principal's office and thereby getting out of English class
  • throwing a kicking, screaming, flailing temper tantrum ---> getting out of morning circle (and getting comfort from the teacher or aide, which would also be an example of getting attention from teachers or peers)

obtaining a desired object or event - for example~

  • threatening to "get" a peer after school ---> getting the peer to hand over his dessert
  • yelling "It's not fair," "You don't like me," or "He cut in front" ---> getting the teacher to let you be first in line
  • cursing at the teacher when she insists you do the assignment ---> getting to see the teacher "lose it" by ranting and raving in front of the class
  • flicking the light switch on and off ---> getting to watch a light flicker on and off
  • yelling that you won't do "this baby work" ---> getting the teacher to help you with the assignment

**A---> B ---> C ---> Analysis**

An ABC analysis enables you to analyze clues about why the student keeps doing the same problem behavior. Your purpose is to identify patterns in order to hypothesize about the function the problem behavior is serving.

*Antecedent* what happens just before the behavior occurs identification of the people, events, and/or things present in the situation just before each behavior

*Behavior* what the student does the problem behavior stated in observable terms

*Consequence* what happens after the behavior what happens after the student engages in the problem behavior


**Example 1**

Date: September 25, 2000 Observer: Ms. A. Jackson [T = teacher]
Student: Ryan who: teacher and 6 peers
what: guided reading lesson where: front table
when: 9:05 -9:52  

Antecedents
Behavior
Consequences
1. T introduced the story and led students through predicting the story based on the title and key questions. T asked the group if they had ever had a pet that embarrassed them in public. 2. Ryan raised his hand and, when called on, said his cockatiel had flown around and landed on a guest's head. 3.T and peers laughed.
4. T said this story would be about a pet which embarrassed its owner. She told Ss to look for what the problem was and how the owner felt. T asked Ryan to start reading. 5. Ryan "read" by making up an irrelevant story including words referring to body functions. 6. Peers laughed. T told him to stop.
7. T read the first 3 words and told Ryan to sound out the next word. 8. Ryan slumped back, crossed his arms, and refused to read. 9. T said Ryan had lost his turn and called on the next student to read.
10. After peer read, T asked who could tell what the problem was. 11. Ryan raised his hand and said that the hamster had climbed in the aunt's hat. 12. T said Ryan should wait to be called on and that he was right. She called on the next student to read.

HYPOTHESIS (based on the assumption that other ABCs showed a similar pattern): avoidance of reading aloud

PLAN: Ease task difficulty by having peer pairs simultaneously read aloud assigned paragraphs from the intended story before the lesson. Then, during the reading lesson, call on Ryan to read one of the paragraphs he and his partner had rehearsed. If the data show a decrease in the inappropriate behavior, gradually increase the number of assigned paragraphs. Eventually have Ryan read unassigned sentences and then unassigned paragraphs.


**Example 2**

Date: October 3, 1999 Observer: Ms. Norman
Student: Alf who: resource teacher (RT), peers in resource room
what: transition from resource room to physical education class where: resource room
when: 10:15 at end of ELA period  

Antecedents
Behavior
Consequences
1. RT announced it was time to go to gym. 2. Alf continued to leaf through a book. He glanced at peers who had moved to the doorway. 3. RT talked with peers for about 30 seconds. She looked at Alf and told him to put the book away and to get in line.
  4. Alf turned his back to RT and threw the book on the floor. 5. RT approached Alf and told him to pick up the book.
  6. Alf got up and picked up the book and took it to the bookcase. He ran to the corner and climbed under the table. 7. RT bent down to be at eye level with Alf under the table. She told him he was wasting gym time and that he needed to hurry up and get in line.
  8. Alf reached out his hand. 9. RT took Alf's hand and led him from under the table.
  10. Alf walked to the gym and waved goodbye to RT. 11. RT laughed, said, "I'll see you tomorrow," and waved back.

HYPOTHESIS (based on the assumption that other ABCs showed a similar pattern): attention from the teacher

PLAN: Teach Alf a way to gain attention by

a) allowing him to be the "timer" who pushes the two-minute warning buzzer,

b) praising him for a specific work behavior or academic response just before asking students to line up,

c) posting his name on the "hard workers of the day" bulletin board,

d) allowing him to ask a peer to walk next to him on the way to gym, and/or

e) allowing him to be line leader.


**About the Author**

Joan M. Miller, Ph.D., Professor of Education, Mount Saint Mary College, Newburgh, New York

*teaches courses in special education, behavior management, literacy for pupils with disabilities, and using technology with pupils with disabilities.

*interests include teacher education, effective teaching research in special education, and educational technology.

Need help making a functional behavioral assessment? Visit TeAch-nology.com's Functional Behavioral Assessment Generator at: http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/materials/fba/

ADAPTING CURRICULA FOR PRIMARY-AGE
                  CHILDREN 
                   		
                  I.Develop an Appropriate IEP 
                  
                  A.Curricula for students in regular education are determined by the school district; for students receiving special education
                  services, curricula are 
                  determined by the student: the IEP is the student's curriculum. 
B.Based on the child's current skills, functional and academic, and the skills he/she needs in order to be
                   successful in the environment, prioritize goals and 
                  objectives. 
C.Determine the school
                  and community environments in which each goal and objective will be a priority.
                   
                  II.Develop a Plan to Integrate the Student's Goals and Objectives in the Regular Class Setting (Johnson City School District,
                  1990, cited by Gallucci, 1990) 
                  
                  A.Develop daily/weekly schedule for the regular class.
B.Identify activities that will occur in each time block and transition.
C.Match the student's objective s with each activity and transition.
D.For each match, identify the level of adaptation needed:
1.Unadapted: same activity, same objective.
2.Regular-Adapted: same activity, different objectives (student participates at a different level, and/or
with adaptations, as different response modes).	
3.Regular-Embedded: same theme/concept, different objectives (objective
                  may not be to master subject area and content, but rather to participate in group 
                  instruction and develop social, motor and communication goals).
4.Functional different activity, different objectives (objectives are not drawn from the regular curriculum,
                  but have immediate use in the student's 
                  daily experience).
E.Determine which
                  times in the day have limited or no match; plan for separate instruction.
F.Determine who will support and/or provide instruction for each match:
1. Regular education teacher
2.Peer
                  support (peer tutoring, peer buddies,cooperative learning groups)
3.Support staff (speech clinicians, therapists,counselors)
4.Educational assistant
5.Classroom
                  volunteer
III.Develop Adaptations
A.Determine how the existing skills of the learner can be used in the
                  adaptation (communication, reading, writing, spelling, math, basic concepts).
B.Consider the learning style of the students
1.Some students with disabilities may learn best with use visual stimuli
2.Some students with disabilities may have difficulty with auditory memory and auditory processing
3.Some students with disabilities may have fewer short-term memory
                  channels
4.Some students with disabilities
                  may learn best by doing	
C.Be sure
                  that the material presented is meaningful and useful for the child - motivation is very important.
D.Use the principles of programming:
1.Move from the simple to the complex
a. match
b.select
c.name
2.Allow the child to succeed
3.Be sure criterion for performance is reached at one level before moving to the next level
4.Provide feedback - and make it positive
E.Use special education techniques when needed:
1.Task analysis
2.Chaining
3.Stimulus
                  supports/Fading
4.Prompting
5.Modeling
6.Physical assistance
F.Plan
                  for the stages of learning:
1.Acquisition
2.Practice to proficiency (fluency)
3.Transfer and generalization
G.Plan for ways to give the child status with peers - plan	adaptations to put him/her in a leadership role
                  when possible (one teacher made her pupil with a disability the computer expert: other pupils had to consult with him in order
                  to learn programs).
H.The adaption
                  should be planned to build the learner's independence and competence.
IV.Implement Your Plan
A.Be
                  sure that planned adaptations are in place and that the support staff implementing the program understands how toimplement
                  the program and use adaptations effectively.
B.Be
                  sure that support staff responsible for each program	are scheduled when and were the adaption is to take place.
V.Evaluate
A. Take data:
1.Determine
                  the best way to measure pupil progress toward each objective - teaching the student to keep his/her own data, using charts,
                  is an excellent adaptation for the use of math and reading skills.
2.If the pupil reaches criteria for mastery (80% and above for 2 or 3 days considered mastery), MOVE ON TO
                  THE NEXT STEP - DO NOT ALLOW THE STUDENT TO GET STUCK DOING THE SAME THING DAY AFTER DAY - CHALLENGE HIM/HER TO MOVE FORWARD
                  AND MAKE PROGRESS.
3.If the pupil is
                  not making progress (below 50% for 2 or 3 days), DO NOT ALLOW THE CHILD TO CONTINUE TO FAIL THE ADAPTION IS TO MAKE THE LEARNER
                  SUCCESSFUL - IF SHE/HE IS NOT SUCCEEDING, THEN THE ADAPTATION IS NOT DOING ITS JOB; IT IS HANDICAPPING THE LEARNER. Consider
                  these options: 
                  
                  a.Slice back
b.Break the task down
                  into smaller steps
c.Change your feedback
                  - it may not be reinforcing to the pupil
d.Try
                  new materials and novelty
e.Make new
                  adaptations - perhaps the task needs to be more functional and meaningful for the student
f.Put it aside for now - it is possible that the student is unable
                  to do the task - work at a level at which the student can succeed - come back to this task later, if this skill is a priority.
                  
* * * * * * * *

ADDRESSING SKILL DEFICITS